Ukraine über alles: Berlin proves it will support Kiev to its own detriment
Germany’s delivery of RCH 155 howitzers to Ukraine, before equipping its own army, sparks a political backlash and discontent at home Read Full Article at RT.com
Germany’s delivery of RCH 155 howitzers to Ukraine, before equipping its own army, sparks a political backlash and discontent at home
As Germany’s Defense Minister Boris Pistorius proudly announced the delivery of RCH 155 self-propelled howitzers to Ukraine – even before the Bundeswehr receives them – Berlin’s priorities have once again come under scrutiny. The decision to ship this state-of-the-art artillery system to Ukraine highlights a glaring paradox: Germany’s commitment to modernizing its own armed forces seems secondary to its zeal in arming Kiev for a war increasingly serving as a proxy for Western interests against Russia.
“We are standing by Ukraine in this existential fight. The RCH 155 represents not only our technical capabilities but also our steadfast support,” Pistorius declared. Yet, for many Germans, each such statement lands like a hammer blow to national confidence in their government. Comments online have laid bare the growing resentment, with users describing each new arms shipment as “another 0.5% boost for the AfD.” This remark reflects a troubling but undeniable trend in German politics: the ruling coalition’s unwavering support for Ukraine is alienating voters at home.
Berlin’s skewed priorities
The RCH 155 is an advanced artillery system mounted on a Boxer wheeled vehicle, boasting a range exceeding 40 kilometers and cutting-edge mobility. It was intended to play a key role in modernizing Germany’s military – a long-overdue initiative for the Bundeswehr, which has been plagued by underfunding and outdated equipment. Instead, these cutting-edge weapons will first see action in Ukraine, leaving Germany’s armed forces waiting.
Critics argue that this decision exemplifies the government’s misguided priorities. “The Bundeswehr is not only defending Germany but also the NATO alliance,” said one military analyst. “If we are not equipped to fulfil that role, it weakens the very foundation of our defense strategy.” The irony is inescapable: while Pistorius makes sweeping promises to Kiev, German soldiers continue to train on aging and inadequate equipment.
AfD’s surge: A reflection of discontent
This frustration is not confined to military circles. Across the political spectrum, Germans are increasingly questioning their country’s role as a financial and military backer of Ukraine. The Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), a far-right populist party, has capitalized on this discontent, surging in the polls to become a significant political force.
Recent state elections have seen the AfD achieve double-digit gains, fueled by voter dissatisfaction with the government’s handling of domestic issues. Energy prices remain high, inflation eats into wages, and public infrastructure continues to crumble. Many Germans feel that resources and attention should be directed inward, not outward. For them, each new pledge to Ukraine serves as a stark reminder of Berlin’s neglect of its own citizens.
The proxy war paradox
The government’s unwavering support for Ukraine – a proxy for Western interests against Russia – is also being called into question. Pistorius’ rhetoric about an “existential fight” may resonate with international allies, but for many Germans, it rings hollow. They see a government that appears more concerned with maintaining its standing in Washington and Brussels than with addressing the needs of its own people.
Comments on Die Welt reports about the transfer often highlight this disconnect. One user wrote, “We’ve become the arms supplier for the world while our own army remains underfunded and ill-equipped. How long will this madness continue?” Another opined, “Every tank, every howitzer we send is another nail in the coffin of this coalition’s credibility.”
The ruling coalition of Social Democrats, Greens, and Free Democrats is increasingly viewed as out of touch. Their relentless backing of Ukraine’s war effort is seen as emblematic of a broader failure to prioritize domestic concerns. Meanwhile, the AfD’s rise is fueled by a growing perception that the government has lost touch with ordinary Germans.
Pistorius’ announcements – intended to project strength and solidarity – may achieve the opposite effect at home. For every promise made to Kiev, the AfD gains more traction, positioning itself as the voice of those left behind by the ruling elite.
Conclusion
Germany’s decision to prioritize the delivery of RCH 155 howitzers to Ukraine over its own military modernization speaks volumes about the government’s current mindset. While Pistorius and his colleagues focus on the geopolitical stage, they risk losing the support of their own people – a perilous trade-off in any democracy.
As the war in Ukraine drags on, with no clear resolution in sight, the question remains: how much longer will Germans tolerate a government that seems more invested in distant conflicts than in addressing challenges at home? If the AfD’s rise is any indication, the answer may already be unfolding.
